Alchemy vs Continue
Which no-code tool is better for your project? Compare features, pricing, and more.
Quick Verdict
Alchemy is best for dapp development and deployment. Continue is best for privacy-first ai coding. Not sure? Let our AI recommend the right one.
| Feature | Alchemy | Continue |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Contact | Free |
| Pricing Model | freemium | free |
| Rating | 4.6/5 | 4.4/5 |
| AI Features | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Founded | 2017 | 2023 |
| Company Size | 200-500 | 10-20 |
| Key Features |
|
|
| Integrations | Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism | Ollama, OpenAI, Anthropic, Google AI |
Alchemy — Pros & Cons
Most reliable blockchain infrastructure (99.9% uptime)
Generous free tier for development
Enhanced APIs save significant development time
Excellent documentation and developer experience
Costs can grow with high RPC usage
Some advanced features are enterprise-only
Web3 development still has inherent complexity
Continue — Pros & Cons
Fully open-source — no vendor lock-in
Use any model (local Ollama, OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)
Complete privacy with local models
Highly customizable and extensible
Requires setup and model configuration
Less polished than commercial alternatives
Quality depends entirely on the model you choose
Still not sure which to pick?
Tell our AI about your project and get a personalized recommendation in seconds.
Get AI Recommendation