AWS vs Supabase

Which no-code tool is better for your project? Compare features, pricing, and more.

AWS

AWS

The world's most comprehensive cloud platform.

4.5
Try AWS
Supabase

Supabase

The open-source Firebase alternative — build in a weekend, scale to millions.

4.7
Try Supabase

Quick Verdict

AWS is best for enterprise cloud infrastructure. Supabase is best for full-stack app backend. Not sure? Let our AI recommend the right one.

FeatureAWSSupabase
PricingContactFrom $25/mo
Pricing Modelfreemiumfreemium
Rating4.5/54.7/5
AI Features✓ Yes✓ Yes
Founded20062020
Company SizeAmazon (1,500,000+)100-200
Key Features
  • 200+ cloud services
  • EC2 compute instances
  • S3 object storage
  • Lambda serverless functions
  • RDS and DynamoDB databases
  • Managed PostgreSQL database
  • Authentication and user management
  • Real-time subscriptions
  • Auto-generated REST and GraphQL APIs
  • Edge functions (Deno)
IntegrationsGitHub, GitLab, Terraform, DockerVercel, Netlify, FlutterFlow, Next.js

AWS — Pros & Cons

Most comprehensive cloud platform — service for everything
Global infrastructure with 30+ regions
Massive ecosystem of tools, certifications, and partners
Free tier includes 12 months of many services
Extremely complex — steep learning curve
Pricing is opaque and hard to predict
Console UI is dated and difficult to navigate

Supabase — Pros & Cons

Open-source with self-hosting option
Built on PostgreSQL — no proprietary database lock-in
Generous free tier (500 MB database, 1 GB storage)
Growing rapidly as the go-to backend for modern apps
Free tier projects pause after 1 week of inactivity
Edge functions are Deno-only (not Node.js)
Some features (branching, read replicas) still maturing

Still not sure which to pick?

Tell our AI about your project and get a personalized recommendation in seconds.

Get AI Recommendation