Cody AI vs Continue

Which no-code tool is better for your project? Compare features, pricing, and more.

Cody AI

Cody AI

AI coding assistant powered by Sourcegraph's code intelligence.

4.3
Try Cody AI
Continue

Continue

Open-source AI code assistant for any model and IDE.

4.4
Try Continue

Quick Verdict

Cody AI is best for context-rich code completion. Continue is best for privacy-first ai coding. Not sure? Let our AI recommend the right one.

FeatureCody AIContinue
PricingFrom $9/moFree
Pricing Modelfreemiumfree
Rating4.3/54.4/5
AI Features✓ Yes✓ Yes
Founded20232023
Company Size200-50010-20
Key Features
  • Context-aware code completions
  • Chat with full codebase understanding
  • Multi-model support (Claude, GPT, Gemini)
  • Code explanation and documentation
  • Unit test generation
  • Connect any LLM (local or cloud)
  • Tab autocomplete with any model
  • Chat with codebase context
  • Inline editing and refactoring
  • Custom slash commands
IntegrationsVS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Neovim, SourcegraphOllama, OpenAI, Anthropic, Google AI

Cody AI — Pros & Cons

Best codebase context understanding via Sourcegraph
Choice of multiple AI models
Generous free tier (500 completions/day)
Strong for large, complex codebases
Full power requires Sourcegraph setup
Smaller market share than Copilot
Enterprise features need Sourcegraph license

Continue — Pros & Cons

Fully open-source — no vendor lock-in
Use any model (local Ollama, OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)
Complete privacy with local models
Highly customizable and extensible
Requires setup and model configuration
Less polished than commercial alternatives
Quality depends entirely on the model you choose

Still not sure which to pick?

Tell our AI about your project and get a personalized recommendation in seconds.

Get AI Recommendation