Continue vs Convex

Which no-code tool is better for your project? Compare features, pricing, and more.

Continue

Continue

Open-source AI code assistant for any model and IDE.

4.4
Try Continue
Convex

Convex

Reactive backend-as-a-service with real-time sync.

4.6
Try Convex

Quick Verdict

Continue is best for privacy-first ai coding. Convex is best for real-time collaborative applications. Not sure? Let our AI recommend the right one.

FeatureContinueConvex
PricingFreeFrom $25/mo
Pricing Modelfreefreemium
Rating4.4/54.6/5
AI Features✓ Yes✓ Yes
Founded20232021
Company Size10-2020-50
Key Features
  • Connect any LLM (local or cloud)
  • Tab autocomplete with any model
  • Chat with codebase context
  • Inline editing and refactoring
  • Custom slash commands
  • Reactive real-time database
  • Serverless TypeScript functions
  • Automatic client-server sync
  • File storage
  • Scheduled functions (cron jobs)
IntegrationsOllama, OpenAI, Anthropic, Google AIReact, Next.js, Clerk, Auth0

Continue — Pros & Cons

Fully open-source — no vendor lock-in
Use any model (local Ollama, OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)
Complete privacy with local models
Highly customizable and extensible
Requires setup and model configuration
Less polished than commercial alternatives
Quality depends entirely on the model you choose

Convex — Pros & Cons

Real-time sync is automatic — zero boilerplate
Full-stack type safety with TypeScript
Combines database, functions, and storage in one platform
Excellent developer experience and documentation
Vendor lock-in — proprietary query language
Young platform with smaller ecosystem
Not SQL-based — learning curve for SQL developers

Still not sure which to pick?

Tell our AI about your project and get a personalized recommendation in seconds.

Get AI Recommendation