Continue vs Sanity

Which no-code tool is better for your project? Compare features, pricing, and more.

Continue

Continue

Open-source AI code assistant for any model and IDE.

4.4
Try Continue
Sanity

Sanity

Composable content platform with real-time collaboration.

4.5
Try Sanity

Quick Verdict

Continue is best for privacy-first ai coding. Sanity is best for custom content management systems. Not sure? Let our AI recommend the right one.

FeatureContinueSanity
PricingFreeFrom $15/mo
Pricing Modelfreefreemium
Rating4.4/54.5/5
AI Features✓ Yes✓ Yes
Founded20232017
Company Size10-2050-100
Key Features
  • Connect any LLM (local or cloud)
  • Tab autocomplete with any model
  • Chat with codebase context
  • Inline editing and refactoring
  • Custom slash commands
  • Sanity Studio — customizable React-based editor
  • Structured Content Lake
  • GROQ query language
  • Real-time collaborative editing
  • Content versioning and history
IntegrationsOllama, OpenAI, Anthropic, Google AINext.js, Gatsby, Nuxt, Remix

Continue — Pros & Cons

Fully open-source — no vendor lock-in
Use any model (local Ollama, OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)
Complete privacy with local models
Highly customizable and extensible
Requires setup and model configuration
Less polished than commercial alternatives
Quality depends entirely on the model you choose

Sanity — Pros & Cons

Most flexible and customizable CMS studio
Real-time collaboration built in
GROQ is powerful for complex content queries
Generous free tier for developers
Sanity Studio requires React knowledge to customize
GROQ has a learning curve vs standard REST
Costs scale with API usage and datasets

Still not sure which to pick?

Tell our AI about your project and get a personalized recommendation in seconds.

Get AI Recommendation