Continue vs Sourcegraph

Which no-code tool is better for your project? Compare features, pricing, and more.

Continue

Continue

Open-source AI code assistant for any model and IDE.

4.4
Try Continue
Sourcegraph

Sourcegraph

Code intelligence platform for searching and understanding large codebases.

4.4
Try Sourcegraph

Quick Verdict

Continue is best for privacy-first ai coding. Sourcegraph is best for enterprise code search and navigation. Not sure? Let our AI recommend the right one.

FeatureContinueSourcegraph
PricingFreeContact
Pricing Modelfreefreemium
Rating4.4/54.4/5
AI Features✓ Yes✓ Yes
Founded20232013
Company Size10-20200-500
Key Features
  • Connect any LLM (local or cloud)
  • Tab autocomplete with any model
  • Chat with codebase context
  • Inline editing and refactoring
  • Custom slash commands
  • Universal code search across all repos
  • Cody AI — AI coding assistant
  • Cross-repository code navigation
  • Batch Changes for large-scale refactoring
  • Code Insights for engineering analytics
IntegrationsOllama, OpenAI, Anthropic, Google AIGitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Gerrit

Continue — Pros & Cons

Fully open-source — no vendor lock-in
Use any model (local Ollama, OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)
Complete privacy with local models
Highly customizable and extensible
Requires setup and model configuration
Less polished than commercial alternatives
Quality depends entirely on the model you choose

Sourcegraph — Pros & Cons

Best-in-class code search for large codebases
Cross-repository understanding
Cody AI adds AI capabilities natively
Essential for organizations with many repositories
Enterprise pricing can be significant
Setup complexity for self-hosted instances
Less useful for small codebases

Still not sure which to pick?

Tell our AI about your project and get a personalized recommendation in seconds.

Get AI Recommendation