Cypress vs Playwright

Which no-code tool is better for your project? Compare features, pricing, and more.

Cypress

Cypress

JavaScript end-to-end testing with real-time browser feedback.

4.5
Try Cypress
Playwright

Playwright

Fast, reliable end-to-end testing for modern web apps.

4.6
Try Playwright

Quick Verdict

Cypress is best for frontend end-to-end testing. Playwright is best for end-to-end web application testing. Not sure? Let our AI recommend the right one.

FeatureCypressPlaywright
PricingFrom $67/moFree
Pricing Modelfreemiumfree
Rating4.5/54.6/5
AI Features✗ No✗ No
Founded20142020
Company Size100-2001000+
Key Features
  • Real-time browser test execution
  • Time-travel debugging with snapshots
  • Automatic waiting (no flaky selectors)
  • Network stubbing and interception
  • Cypress Cloud for CI analytics
  • Cross-browser testing (Chromium, Firefox, WebKit)
  • Auto-waiting for elements
  • Network request interception and mocking
  • Codegen — record and generate tests
  • Trace Viewer for debugging
IntegrationsGitHub Actions, CircleCI, Jenkins, GitLab CIGitHub Actions, GitLab CI, CircleCI, Jenkins

Cypress — Pros & Cons

Best-in-class developer experience
Real-time feedback during test development
Automatic waiting reduces test flakiness
Large community and plugin ecosystem
Chromium-only for a long time (now supports Firefox, WebKit)
Cannot test across multiple origins easily
Cypress Cloud pricing for CI features

Playwright — Pros & Cons

Best cross-browser coverage including WebKit/Safari
Faster and more reliable than Selenium
Excellent debugging with Trace Viewer
Strong TypeScript support
Steeper learning curve than Cypress
Smaller community than Selenium (but growing fast)
Less mature plugin ecosystem

Still not sure which to pick?

Tell our AI about your project and get a personalized recommendation in seconds.

Get AI Recommendation