Directus vs Xano
Which no-code tool is better for your project? Compare features, pricing, and more.
Quick Verdict
Directus is best for headless cms for websites and apps. Xano is best for scalable no-code app backend. Not sure? Let our AI recommend the right one.
| Feature | Directus | Xano |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | From $15/mo | From $85/mo |
| Pricing Model | freemium | freemium |
| Rating | 4.5/5 | 4.7/5 |
| AI Features | ✗ No | ✓ Yes |
| Founded | 2016 | 2020 |
| Company Size | 10-50 | 10-50 |
| Key Features |
|
|
| Integrations | PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQLite, S3 | Bubble, FlutterFlow, Webflow, Adalo |
Directus — Pros & Cons
Open-source and self-hostable
Database-agnostic (Postgres, MySQL, SQLite, etc.)
Beautiful admin interface
Both headless CMS and BaaS in one
Requires more setup than Airtable for non-technical users
Cloud pricing tiers can be confusing
Documentation can lag behind features
Xano — Pros & Cons
True scalable backend for no-code apps
Full API flexibility (REST)
No vendor lock-in on data (PostgreSQL)
Handles complex backend logic visually
Expensive starting price ($85/month)
Learning curve for the function stack logic builder
Not needed for simple apps (overkill)
Still not sure which to pick?
Tell our AI about your project and get a personalized recommendation in seconds.
Get AI Recommendation