Evidence vs Hotjar

Which no-code tool is better for your project? Compare features, pricing, and more.

Evidence

Evidence

Code-driven BI with Markdown reports and version control.

4.3
Try Evidence
Hotjar

Hotjar

Understand how users behave on your site.

4.4
Try Hotjar

Quick Verdict

Evidence is best for code-driven business reports. Hotjar is best for ux research and optimization. Not sure? Let our AI recommend the right one.

FeatureEvidenceHotjar
PricingContactContact
Pricing Modelfreemiumfreemium
Rating4.3/54.4/5
AI Features✗ No✓ Yes
Founded20222014
Company Size10-20200-500
Key Features
  • SQL + Markdown report authoring
  • Auto-generated charts and tables
  • Git-based version control
  • Static site deployment
  • Parameterized reports
  • Heatmaps (click, move, scroll)
  • Session recordings
  • Surveys and feedback widgets
  • Funnels
  • User interviews (Engage)
IntegrationsPostgreSQL, BigQuery, Snowflake, DuckDBGoogle Analytics, Slack, Zapier, HubSpot

Evidence — Pros & Cons

Reports as code — Git-friendly and reviewable
Beautiful default styling out of the box
No database to maintain — static output
Open-source with active development
Requires SQL and Markdown knowledge
No point-and-click dashboard builder
Smaller community than Metabase or Superset

Hotjar — Pros & Cons

Best heatmap and session recording combination
Very easy to set up (one script tag)
Generous free tier (35 daily sessions)
Surveys and feedback integrated natively
Not a full product analytics tool (no custom events/funnels like Mixpanel)
Session recordings limited on lower plans
Can slow down pages slightly on heavy sites

Still not sure which to pick?

Tell our AI about your project and get a personalized recommendation in seconds.

Get AI Recommendation