Evidence vs Maze

Which no-code tool is better for your project? Compare features, pricing, and more.

Evidence

Evidence

Code-driven BI with Markdown reports and version control.

4.3
Try Evidence
Maze

Maze

Rapid testing platform for user research at scale.

4.5
Try Maze

Quick Verdict

Evidence is best for code-driven business reports. Maze is best for prototype usability testing. Not sure? Let our AI recommend the right one.

FeatureEvidenceMaze
PricingContactContact
Pricing Modelfreemiumfreemium
Rating4.3/54.5/5
AI Features✗ No✓ Yes
Founded20222017
Company Size10-20100-200
Key Features
  • SQL + Markdown report authoring
  • Auto-generated charts and tables
  • Git-based version control
  • Static site deployment
  • Parameterized reports
  • Unmoderated usability testing
  • Prototype testing (Figma, Adobe XD)
  • Surveys and questionnaires
  • Card sorting and tree testing
  • Heatmaps and click maps
IntegrationsPostgreSQL, BigQuery, Snowflake, DuckDBFigma, Adobe XD, InVision, Slack

Evidence — Pros & Cons

Reports as code — Git-friendly and reviewable
Beautiful default styling out of the box
No database to maintain — static output
Open-source with active development
Requires SQL and Markdown knowledge
No point-and-click dashboard builder
Smaller community than Metabase or Superset

Maze — Pros & Cons

No scheduling needed — asynchronous testing
Excellent Figma integration for prototype testing
Fast results — insights in hours, not weeks
Free tier for basic testing
Unmoderated tests miss follow-up insights
Panel participant quality can vary
Advanced analysis features require paid plans

Still not sure which to pick?

Tell our AI about your project and get a personalized recommendation in seconds.

Get AI Recommendation