Evidence vs Umami
Which no-code tool is better for your project? Compare features, pricing, and more.
Quick Verdict
Evidence is best for code-driven business reports. Umami is best for developer-friendly web analytics. Not sure? Let our AI recommend the right one.
| Feature | Evidence | Umami |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Contact | Contact |
| Pricing Model | freemium | freemium |
| Rating | 4.3/5 | 4.6/5 |
| AI Features | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| Founded | 2022 | 2020 |
| Company Size | 10-20 | 1-10 |
| Key Features |
|
|
| Integrations | PostgreSQL, BigQuery, Snowflake, DuckDB | Vercel, Netlify, Docker, PostgreSQL |
Evidence — Pros & Cons
Reports as code — Git-friendly and reviewable
Beautiful default styling out of the box
No database to maintain — static output
Open-source with active development
Requires SQL and Markdown knowledge
No point-and-click dashboard builder
Smaller community than Metabase or Superset
Umami — Pros & Cons
Completely open-source (MIT license)
Free to self-host with no limits
Extremely lightweight and fast
Simple, clean interface
Very basic analytics — no funnels or advanced features
Self-hosting required for free tier
No session replays or heatmaps
Still not sure which to pick?
Tell our AI about your project and get a personalized recommendation in seconds.
Get AI Recommendation