Fly.io vs Supabase

Which no-code tool is better for your project? Compare features, pricing, and more.

Fly.io

Fly.io

Run your full-stack apps close to your users — globally.

4.3
Try Fly.io
Supabase

Supabase

The open-source Firebase alternative — build in a weekend, scale to millions.

4.7
Try Supabase

Quick Verdict

Fly.io is best for globally distributed applications. Supabase is best for full-stack app backend. Not sure? Let our AI recommend the right one.

FeatureFly.ioSupabase
PricingContactFrom $25/mo
Pricing Modelfreemiumfreemium
Rating4.3/54.7/5
AI Features✗ No✓ Yes
Founded20172020
Company Size50-100100-200
Key Features
  • Global edge deployment (35+ regions)
  • Firecracker micro-VMs
  • Built-in PostgreSQL (Fly Postgres)
  • GPU machines for AI workloads
  • Anycast networking
  • Managed PostgreSQL database
  • Authentication and user management
  • Real-time subscriptions
  • Auto-generated REST and GraphQL APIs
  • Edge functions (Deno)
IntegrationsGitHub Actions, Docker, PostgreSQL, RedisVercel, Netlify, FlutterFlow, Next.js

Fly.io — Pros & Cons

Deploy anywhere in the world — low-latency by default
Runs real full-stack apps (not just serverless functions)
Great for real-time apps, multiplayer, and global services
Competitive pricing for global distribution
Steeper learning curve than Railway or Render
Managed database (Fly Postgres) is less mature than dedicated services
Smaller ecosystem and community

Supabase — Pros & Cons

Open-source with self-hosting option
Built on PostgreSQL — no proprietary database lock-in
Generous free tier (500 MB database, 1 GB storage)
Growing rapidly as the go-to backend for modern apps
Free tier projects pause after 1 week of inactivity
Edge functions are Deno-only (not Node.js)
Some features (branching, read replicas) still maturing

Still not sure which to pick?

Tell our AI about your project and get a personalized recommendation in seconds.

Get AI Recommendation