Hetzner vs Supabase

Which no-code tool is better for your project? Compare features, pricing, and more.

Hetzner

Hetzner

High-performance cloud and dedicated servers at unbeatable prices.

4.6
Try Hetzner
Supabase

Supabase

The open-source Firebase alternative — build in a weekend, scale to millions.

4.7
Try Supabase

Quick Verdict

Hetzner is best for cost-effective cloud hosting. Supabase is best for full-stack app backend. Not sure? Let our AI recommend the right one.

FeatureHetznerSupabase
PricingFrom $3/moFrom $25/mo
Pricing Modelpaidfreemium
Rating4.6/54.7/5
AI Features✗ No✓ Yes
Founded19972020
Company Size1000-5000100-200
Key Features
  • Cloud servers (shared and dedicated vCPU)
  • Dedicated root servers
  • Managed Kubernetes
  • Load balancers
  • Block and object storage
  • Managed PostgreSQL database
  • Authentication and user management
  • Real-time subscriptions
  • Auto-generated REST and GraphQL APIs
  • Edge functions (Deno)
IntegrationsTerraform, Docker, Kubernetes, AnsibleVercel, Netlify, FlutterFlow, Next.js

Hetzner — Pros & Cons

Best price-to-performance ratio in cloud hosting
GDPR-compliant European data centers
Dedicated servers are extremely affordable
Reliable infrastructure with strong uptime
Data centers only in Europe and US (limited global reach)
Fewer managed services than AWS or GCP
Less hand-holding — requires more ops knowledge

Supabase — Pros & Cons

Open-source with self-hosting option
Built on PostgreSQL — no proprietary database lock-in
Generous free tier (500 MB database, 1 GB storage)
Growing rapidly as the go-to backend for modern apps
Free tier projects pause after 1 week of inactivity
Edge functions are Deno-only (not Node.js)
Some features (branching, read replicas) still maturing

Still not sure which to pick?

Tell our AI about your project and get a personalized recommendation in seconds.

Get AI Recommendation