Hotjar vs UserTesting

Which no-code tool is better for your project? Compare features, pricing, and more.

Hotjar

Hotjar

Understand how users behave on your site.

4.4
Try Hotjar
UserTesting

UserTesting

Get real human insights to build better experiences.

4.3
Try UserTesting

Quick Verdict

Hotjar is best for ux research and optimization. UserTesting is best for website and app usability testing. Not sure? Let our AI recommend the right one.

FeatureHotjarUserTesting
PricingContactContact
Pricing Modelfreemiumenterprise
Rating4.4/54.3/5
AI Features✓ Yes✓ Yes
Founded20142007
Company Size200-5001000+
Key Features
  • Heatmaps (click, move, scroll)
  • Session recordings
  • Surveys and feedback widgets
  • Funnels
  • User interviews (Engage)
  • Video-based user testing (moderated and unmoderated)
  • Global participant panel (2M+ testers)
  • Live conversation interviews
  • AI-powered insight analysis
  • Click testing and first-click analysis
IntegrationsGoogle Analytics, Slack, Zapier, HubSpotFigma, Adobe XD, Slack, Jira

Hotjar — Pros & Cons

Best heatmap and session recording combination
Very easy to set up (one script tag)
Generous free tier (35 daily sessions)
Surveys and feedback integrated natively
Not a full product analytics tool (no custom events/funnels like Mixpanel)
Session recordings limited on lower plans
Can slow down pages slightly on heavy sites

UserTesting — Pros & Cons

High-quality video feedback from real users
Massive participant panel with targeting options
AI analysis saves hours of video review
Supports both moderated and unmoderated formats
Enterprise pricing — very expensive for small teams
Setup and test design has a learning curve
Participant quality can vary by demographic

Still not sure which to pick?

Tell our AI about your project and get a personalized recommendation in seconds.

Get AI Recommendation