Make vs Octoparse
Which no-code tool is better for your project? Compare features, pricing, and more.
Quick Verdict
Make is best for business process automation. Octoparse is best for e-commerce product data extraction. Not sure? Let our AI recommend the right one.
| Feature | Make | Octoparse |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | From $9/mo | Contact |
| Pricing Model | freemium | freemium |
| Rating | 4.7/5 | 4.3/5 |
| AI Features | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Founded | 2012 | 2016 |
| Company Size | 500-1000 | 50-100 |
| Key Features |
|
|
| Integrations | Google Workspace, Slack, Airtable, Notion | Google Sheets, Excel, MySQL, SQL Server |
Make — Pros & Cons
Far more powerful than Zapier for complex workflows
Visual canvas makes complex logic understandable
Much cheaper than Zapier at scale
Excellent HTTP/API module for custom integrations
Steeper learning curve than Zapier
UI can feel cluttered for very large scenarios
Some app integrations have fewer triggers/actions than Zapier's
Octoparse — Pros & Cons
No coding required — truly point-and-click
Auto-detection simplifies data selection
Cloud execution means no local resources needed
Good template library for common websites
Complex sites may need manual configuration
Free tier is limited (10 tasks)
Less flexible than code-based solutions
Still not sure which to pick?
Tell our AI about your project and get a personalized recommendation in seconds.
Get AI Recommendation