Make vs Pipedream
Which no-code tool is better for your project? Compare features, pricing, and more.
Quick Verdict
Make is best for business process automation. Pipedream is best for developer workflow automation. Not sure? Let our AI recommend the right one.
| Feature | Make | Pipedream |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | From $9/mo | From $29/mo |
| Pricing Model | freemium | freemium |
| Rating | 4.7/5 | 4.6/5 |
| AI Features | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Founded | 2012 | 2018 |
| Company Size | 500-1000 | 50-100 |
| Key Features |
|
|
| Integrations | Google Workspace, Slack, Airtable, Notion | GitHub, Slack, Stripe, Google Sheets |
Make — Pros & Cons
Far more powerful than Zapier for complex workflows
Visual canvas makes complex logic understandable
Much cheaper than Zapier at scale
Excellent HTTP/API module for custom integrations
Steeper learning curve than Zapier
UI can feel cluttered for very large scenarios
Some app integrations have fewer triggers/actions than Zapier's
Pipedream — Pros & Cons
Best for developers who want both code and visual workflows
Excellent free tier (10k invocations/month)
Built-in auth for thousands of APIs
Very fast to build custom integrations
Requires coding knowledge to fully leverage
Not suited for non-technical users
Visual builder is basic compared to Make
Still not sure which to pick?
Tell our AI about your project and get a personalized recommendation in seconds.
Get AI Recommendation