Maze vs Umami
Which no-code tool is better for your project? Compare features, pricing, and more.
Quick Verdict
Maze is best for prototype usability testing. Umami is best for developer-friendly web analytics. Not sure? Let our AI recommend the right one.
| Feature | Maze | Umami |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Contact | Contact |
| Pricing Model | freemium | freemium |
| Rating | 4.5/5 | 4.6/5 |
| AI Features | ✓ Yes | ✗ No |
| Founded | 2017 | 2020 |
| Company Size | 100-200 | 1-10 |
| Key Features |
|
|
| Integrations | Figma, Adobe XD, InVision, Slack | Vercel, Netlify, Docker, PostgreSQL |
Maze — Pros & Cons
No scheduling needed — asynchronous testing
Excellent Figma integration for prototype testing
Fast results — insights in hours, not weeks
Free tier for basic testing
Unmoderated tests miss follow-up insights
Panel participant quality can vary
Advanced analysis features require paid plans
Umami — Pros & Cons
Completely open-source (MIT license)
Free to self-host with no limits
Extremely lightweight and fast
Simple, clean interface
Very basic analytics — no funnels or advanced features
Self-hosting required for free tier
No session replays or heatmaps
Still not sure which to pick?
Tell our AI about your project and get a personalized recommendation in seconds.
Get AI Recommendation