Netlify vs Supabase
Which no-code tool is better for your project? Compare features, pricing, and more.
Supabase
The open-source Firebase alternative — build in a weekend, scale to millions.
4.7
Try SupabaseQuick Verdict
Netlify is best for jamstack and static site hosting. Supabase is best for full-stack app backend. Not sure? Let our AI recommend the right one.
| Feature | Netlify | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | From $19/mo | From $25/mo |
| Pricing Model | freemium | freemium |
| Rating | 4.5/5 | 4.7/5 |
| AI Features | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Founded | 2014 | 2020 |
| Company Size | 200-500 | 100-200 |
| Key Features |
|
|
| Integrations | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Sanity | Vercel, Netlify, FlutterFlow, Next.js |
Netlify — Pros & Cons
Pioneered modern web hosting — mature and reliable
Built-in forms, auth, and functions reduce dependencies
Framework-agnostic — works with any static site generator or framework
Generous free tier (100 GB bandwidth/month)
Serverless functions have cold start latency
Less Next.js-optimized than Vercel
Bandwidth costs can spike on popular sites
Supabase — Pros & Cons
Open-source with self-hosting option
Built on PostgreSQL — no proprietary database lock-in
Generous free tier (500 MB database, 1 GB storage)
Growing rapidly as the go-to backend for modern apps
Free tier projects pause after 1 week of inactivity
Edge functions are Deno-only (not Node.js)
Some features (branching, read replicas) still maturing
Still not sure which to pick?
Tell our AI about your project and get a personalized recommendation in seconds.
Get AI Recommendation