Redash vs Umami
Which no-code tool is better for your project? Compare features, pricing, and more.
Quick Verdict
Redash is best for sql-based analytics dashboards. Umami is best for developer-friendly web analytics. Not sure? Let our AI recommend the right one.
| Feature | Redash | Umami |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free | Contact |
| Pricing Model | free | freemium |
| Rating | 4.1/5 | 4.6/5 |
| AI Features | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| Founded | 2015 | 2020 |
| Company Size | N/A | 1-10 |
| Key Features |
|
|
| Integrations | PostgreSQL, MySQL, BigQuery, Redshift | Vercel, Netlify, Docker, PostgreSQL |
Redash — Pros & Cons
Open-source and self-hostable
Simple, SQL-first approach
Wide data source support
Quick setup for technical teams
No longer actively maintained by original team
Limited visualization options
No visual query builder — SQL required
Umami — Pros & Cons
Completely open-source (MIT license)
Free to self-host with no limits
Extremely lightweight and fast
Simple, clean interface
Very basic analytics — no funnels or advanced features
Self-hosting required for free tier
No session replays or heatmaps
Still not sure which to pick?
Tell our AI about your project and get a personalized recommendation in seconds.
Get AI Recommendation