Supabase vs Turso
Which no-code tool is better for your project? Compare features, pricing, and more.
Supabase
The open-source Firebase alternative — build in a weekend, scale to millions.
4.7
Try SupabaseQuick Verdict
Supabase is best for full-stack app backend. Turso is best for edge-first web applications. Not sure? Let our AI recommend the right one.
| Feature | Supabase | Turso |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | From $25/mo | From $8/mo |
| Pricing Model | freemium | freemium |
| Rating | 4.7/5 | 4.4/5 |
| AI Features | ✓ Yes | ✗ No |
| Founded | 2020 | 2022 |
| Company Size | 100-200 | 20-50 |
| Key Features |
|
|
| Integrations | Vercel, Netlify, FlutterFlow, Next.js | Drizzle, Prisma, Next.js, Remix |
Supabase — Pros & Cons
Open-source with self-hosting option
Built on PostgreSQL — no proprietary database lock-in
Generous free tier (500 MB database, 1 GB storage)
Growing rapidly as the go-to backend for modern apps
Free tier projects pause after 1 week of inactivity
Edge functions are Deno-only (not Node.js)
Some features (branching, read replicas) still maturing
Turso — Pros & Cons
Ultra-low latency reads at the edge
Generous free tier (500 databases, 9GB storage)
SQLite familiarity — zero learning curve
Embedded replicas enable offline-first apps
SQLite limitations (no concurrent writes at scale)
Young ecosystem compared to Postgres/MySQL
Complex queries may need optimization
Still not sure which to pick?
Tell our AI about your project and get a personalized recommendation in seconds.
Get AI Recommendation