Supabase vs Upstash

Which no-code tool is better for your project? Compare features, pricing, and more.

Supabase

Supabase

The open-source Firebase alternative — build in a weekend, scale to millions.

4.7
Try Supabase
Upstash

Upstash

Serverless Redis, Kafka, and QStash for modern apps.

4.5
Try Upstash

Quick Verdict

Supabase is best for full-stack app backend. Upstash is best for rate limiting and caching. Not sure? Let our AI recommend the right one.

FeatureSupabaseUpstash
PricingFrom $25/moContact
Pricing Modelfreemiumfreemium
Rating4.7/54.5/5
AI Features✓ Yes✗ No
Founded20202021
Company Size100-20020-50
Key Features
  • Managed PostgreSQL database
  • Authentication and user management
  • Real-time subscriptions
  • Auto-generated REST and GraphQL APIs
  • Edge functions (Deno)
  • Serverless Redis with REST API
  • Serverless Kafka for event streaming
  • QStash for HTTP-based messaging
  • Global replication and edge support
  • Per-request pricing (pay as you go)
IntegrationsVercel, Netlify, FlutterFlow, Next.jsVercel, Cloudflare Workers, Next.js, Remix

Supabase — Pros & Cons

Open-source with self-hosting option
Built on PostgreSQL — no proprietary database lock-in
Generous free tier (500 MB database, 1 GB storage)
Growing rapidly as the go-to backend for modern apps
Free tier projects pause after 1 week of inactivity
Edge functions are Deno-only (not Node.js)
Some features (branching, read replicas) still maturing

Upstash — Pros & Cons

True serverless — pay only for what you use
REST API works in any environment (edge, serverless)
Generous free tier for experimentation
Purpose-built for modern serverless architectures
Not suitable for heavy, persistent Redis workloads
REST-based access adds latency vs native protocols
Limited advanced Redis features

Still not sure which to pick?

Tell our AI about your project and get a personalized recommendation in seconds.

Get AI Recommendation