Supabase vs Xano
Which no-code tool is better for your project? Compare features, pricing, and more.
Supabase
The open-source Firebase alternative — build in a weekend, scale to millions.
4.7
Try SupabaseQuick Verdict
Supabase is best for full-stack app backend. Xano is best for scalable no-code app backend. Not sure? Let our AI recommend the right one.
| Feature | Supabase | Xano |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | From $25/mo | From $85/mo |
| Pricing Model | freemium | freemium |
| Rating | 4.7/5 | 4.7/5 |
| AI Features | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Founded | 2020 | 2020 |
| Company Size | 100-200 | 10-50 |
| Key Features |
|
|
| Integrations | Vercel, Netlify, FlutterFlow, Next.js | Bubble, FlutterFlow, Webflow, Adalo |
Supabase — Pros & Cons
Open-source with self-hosting option
Built on PostgreSQL — no proprietary database lock-in
Generous free tier (500 MB database, 1 GB storage)
Growing rapidly as the go-to backend for modern apps
Free tier projects pause after 1 week of inactivity
Edge functions are Deno-only (not Node.js)
Some features (branching, read replicas) still maturing
Xano — Pros & Cons
True scalable backend for no-code apps
Full API flexibility (REST)
No vendor lock-in on data (PostgreSQL)
Handles complex backend logic visually
Expensive starting price ($85/month)
Learning curve for the function stack logic builder
Not needed for simple apps (overkill)
Still not sure which to pick?
Tell our AI about your project and get a personalized recommendation in seconds.
Get AI Recommendation